<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VMware &#8211; StorageHacker</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/tag/vmware/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.storagehacker.com</link>
	<description>Not just another Storage weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:10:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24418214</site>	<item>
		<title>Server Virtualization</title>
		<link>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/108</link>
					<comments>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/108#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[storagehacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 02:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storagehacker.com/?p=108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After 5 years in SAN storage industry with a virtualization focus, I recently shifted gears to just virtualization in the context of servers, storage, and infrastructure.  This has been an eye opening experience, the most enlightening part of this re-focus has been the incredible efforts that Cisco has put into the engineering of the Cisco &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/108" class="more-link">Read More<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Server Virtualization"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 5 years in SAN storage industry with a virtualization focus, I recently shifted gears to just virtualization in the context of servers, storage, and infrastructure.  This has been an eye opening experience, the most enlightening part of this re-focus has been the incredible efforts that Cisco has put into the engineering of the Cisco UCS platform.  While on the surface the Cisco UCS B-Series looks like just another blade center server, never judge a book by its cover.</p>
<p>The Cisco UCS Platform moves the concept of virtualization to the actual hardware.  So where VMware, Citrix, and Microsoft provide products that abstract the physical hardware to allow greater utilization of server hardware, Cisco has extended the concept abstracting hardware to the actual physical servers or blades.  Physical hardware has UUID, MAC Addresses and WWNN/WWPN addresses burned into the hardware, this means the operating system will key in on these addresses for certain features.  While hypervisor&#8217;s hide this physical addressing from the Virtual Machines (VM), the hypervisor itself is tied to these addresses.  This means that you cannot simply upgrade a blade or server by simply replacing it with a newer version, even in a boot from SAN environment without some manual intervention.  Cisco UCS allows for these addresses to be virtual and applied to blade, meaning the addresses can actually be moved from one blade to another.  This accomplished through the use of Service Profiles that contain the configuration of the not only the addressing (UUID, MAC, and WWNN/WWPN) but also the firmware version, number of NICs, number of FC HBAs, bios settings (CPU settings, Memory settings, etc), and boot order.  The Cisco UCS and Data Center products (Nexus 2000/5000/7000, WAAS, ACE, etc) are moving towards a wire once model for all connectivity options (Ethernet, FC, FCoE, or iSCSI).  The means that once the Data Center is wired adding or changing connectivity options does not require the planning, expense and downtime to re-wire.</p>
<p>The combination of Cisco UCS and hypervisor brings virtualization to both hardware and software forming the a very formidable backbone for the next generation data center.  As many companies move towards greater levels of virtualization, private cloud, hybrid cloud, and public cloud to provide more services to end users having scalable and flexible hardware platform is just a key as having a hypervisor that it is scalable and flexible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/108/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">108</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting VDI facts</title>
		<link>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/61</link>
					<comments>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/61#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[storagehacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emprise 5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypervisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xiotech]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.storagehacker.com/?p=61</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most of the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) sizing and performance papers found from the virtualization companies and storage companies state that for sizing purposes a range of 5-20 I/O per seconds (IOPs) should be used.  Using this range as ESG Labs did in their Lab report on HP LeftHand P4000 SAN – Optimizing Virtual Desktop &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/61" class="more-link">Read More<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Interesting VDI facts"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) sizing and performance papers found from the virtualization companies and storage companies state that for sizing purposes a range of 5-20 I/O per seconds (IOPs) should be used.  Using this range as ESG Labs did in their Lab report on <a href="http://www.enterprisestrategygroup.com/2009/07/esg-lab-validation-report-hp-lefthand-p4000-san-optimizing-virtual-desktop-infrastructure-with-citrix-xendesktop/" target="_blank">HP LeftHand P4000 SAN – Optimizing Virtual Desktop Infrastructure with Citrix XenDesktop</a> with 5 IOPs being the Optimistic number and 20 IOPs being the Conservative number administrators can use the storage vendors stated IOPs to determine the number of VDI users per storage array.  The lab report provided the following table:</p>
<p><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="102" data-permalink="https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/61/attachment/400024" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?fit=637%2C131&amp;ssl=1" data-orig-size="637,131" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="400024" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?fit=300%2C61&amp;ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?fit=637%2C131&amp;ssl=1" class="aligncenter wp-image-102 size-full" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?resize=637%2C131" alt="400024" width="637" height="131" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?w=637&amp;ssl=1 637w, https://i0.wp.com/www.storagehacker.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/400024.png?resize=300%2C61&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="(max-width: 637px) 100vw, 637px" /></a></p>
<p>The Xiotech Emprise 5000 with 7.8TB of useable RAID5 storage and linear expansion using the above IOP figures provide the following level of VDI Users:</p>
<div>
<table border="1" width="848" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">Number of ISEs</td>
<td align="center" width="153">IOPS</td>
<td align="center" width="194">Virtual Desktops Conservative</td>
<td align="center" width="195">Virtual Desktops<br />
Optimistic</td>
<td align="center" width="146">Response Time<br />
(ms)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">2</td>
<td align="center" width="153">7,000</td>
<td align="center" width="194">350</td>
<td align="center" width="194">1,400</td>
<td align="center" width="146">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">4</td>
<td align="center" width="153">14,000</td>
<td align="center" width="194">700</td>
<td align="center" width="194">2,800</td>
<td align="center" width="146">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">10</td>
<td align="center" width="153">35,000</td>
<td align="center" width="194">1,750</td>
<td align="center" width="194">7,000</td>
<td align="center" width="146">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">15</td>
<td align="center" width="153">52,500</td>
<td align="center" width="194">2,625</td>
<td align="center" width="194">10,500</td>
<td align="center" width="146">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="158">20</td>
<td align="center" width="153">70,000</td>
<td align="center" width="194">3,500</td>
<td align="center" width="194">14,000</td>
<td align="center" width="146">27</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div>However, these numbers does not take into account the fact the VMs require a certain amount of disk space for the installed Guest OS and applications that the VDI users need.  Using VMs configured with Microsoft Windows XP SP3 with a 20GB disk the number of VMs that a Xiotech ISE with 7.8TB of RAID5 usable space could service would actually look more like this:</div>
<div>
<table border="1" width="845" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">Number of ISEs</td>
<td align="center" width="282">Number of VMs<br />
with a 20GB disk</td>
<td align="center" width="281">Number of VMs<br />
with a 30GB disk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">2</td>
<td align="center" width="282">696</td>
<td align="center" width="281">464</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">4</td>
<td align="center" width="282">1,392</td>
<td align="center" width="281">928</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">10</td>
<td align="center" width="282">3,480</td>
<td align="center" width="281">2,320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">15</td>
<td align="center" width="282">5,220</td>
<td align="center" width="281">3,480</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" width="280">20</td>
<td align="center" width="282">6,960</td>
<td align="center" width="281">4,640</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Each ISE is only 3U and is able to provide a very high density of VDI users with excellent performance and reliability.  Given most hypervisor vendors recommend 32-64 VDI VMs per physical host this configuration allows for 40U of rackspace to provide 1392 end users virtual desktops (using twenty-four 1U servers, four 1U FC Switches, and four ISEs).  The gains would be all the redundancy of the hypervisors high availability features, resource management, datacenter power redundancy (UPS and/or Generator) and the ability to enhance security by having all corporate data actually in the datacenter, opposed to user desktops and laptops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.storagehacker.com/archives/61/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">61</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
